writing exactly the same code as in the standard library. Unfortunately or fortunately I have not encountere in practice a situation where using the standard library would have been impossible. Dont like dynamic dependency Nothing prevents you from linking statically. Problem with the library version on the target platform Link statically. Dont like linking statically Link statically Konstantin Vladimirov Its possible. But to do this you will have to rewrite part of the standard library sometimes significant. It was an experience. I will say this developing again what is already in the standard library is first of all boring.
Alexander Enaldiev
embede systems where the size of the project and careful handling of memory are absolute. In other cases I see no reason to deprive myself of an extensive toolkit with good optimization. Stanislav Yurchenko Its possible. But to do this you will have to rewrite part Luxembourg WhatsApp Number List of the standard library sometimes significant. It was an experience. I will say this developing again what is already in the standard library is first of all boring. There is a phrase Every good C library should have a C interface. Why is that Ilya Kazakov.
Happening in the cluster
What is a library interface in the C world These are header files. Every time you include a header file you include all of its dependencies and as a result the librarys dependencies flow into your dependencies. In addition it is possible that the header file uses a standard higher Chile Phone Number List than the standard of your project. In this case using the library will not work at all. But if you provide a header written in C then the headache will be much less. True unfortunately and functionality. Konstantin Vladimirov Due to the fact that C has a stable ABI and there is no manipulation at least type manipulation.
